Books and Edited Works


Books & Edited Books

Case, Donald O., and Lisa M. Given. 2016. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. London, UK: Emerald Press. ISBN 9781785609688. (Publication details)

Book Review
Cole, C. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. Donald O. Case and Lisa M. Given. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing, 2016. 528 pp. $82.95 (hardcover). (ISBN: 9781785609688). (PDF)
Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23778/epdf.

Given, Lisa M. 2016. 100 Questions (and Answers) About Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN 9781483345642. (Publication details)

100 Soruda Nitel Araştirma. Translated by Arif Bakla and Ismail Çakir. Ankara, Turkey: Ani Yayincilik. ISBN 9786051705385

Leckie, Gloria J., Lisa M. Given, and John Buschman, eds. 2010. Critical theory for library and information science: Exploring the social across the disciplines. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited. ISBN: 9781591589389. (Publication details)

Given, Lisa M. 2009. Constructing a ‘mature student’ identity: Implications for academic information behaviours in the university context. VDM-Verlag: Saarbrücken, Germany. ISBN: 978-3639155150. (Publication details)

Given, Lisa M., ed. 2008. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (2 volume set). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN: 9781412941631. (Publication details)


Scholarly Reviews of “Critical theory for library and information science: Exploring the social across the disciplines”

Benoit, Gerry. 2011. Review of Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Library & Information Science Research 33, no. 4: 336-338. (PDF)

Boice, Daniel. 2011. Review of Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Catholic Library World 82, no. 1: 58. (PDF)

“Briefly Noted.” Review of Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Portal: Libraries & The Academy 11, no. 1 (January 2011): 587-588. (PDF)

Hill, Heather, L. 2011. Review of Critical Theory for Library and Information Science Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science & Technology 62, no. 7: 1425-1426. (PDF)

Joint, Nicholas. 2011. Review of Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Library Review, Vol. 60 Iss: 9, pp.832 – 833.  Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1955856&show=html

Keilty, Patrick. 2011. Review of Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across Disciplines. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies 7, no. 2, Article 8. (PDF)

Rioux, Kevin. 2011. Review of Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Progressive Librarian, no. 36/37: 86-88. (PDF)

Williams, Delmus E. 2011. Review of Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Journal Of Academic Librarianship 37, no. 2: 187-188. (PDF)


Scholarly Reviews of “The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods”

Bell, David S. 2009. Review of The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Reference Reviews 23, no. 8: 24-25. (PDF)

Labaree, Robert V. 2009. Review of The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Choice Reviews Online, April. (PDF)

Lougen, Collen. 2009. Review of The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Reference & User Services Quarterly 49, no. 1: 101-102. (PDF)

Marcus, Sara Rofofsky. 2008. Review of The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Library Journal, December: 162-163. (PDF)

Chenail, Ronald J. 2008. The value of community in creating quality: A review of The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. The Weekly Qualitative Report 1, no.1: 2-6. (PDF)